Severity-Ranked Reports
Included on every planEvery scan sorts what it finds into four levels, so your team always knows where to look first instead of working through an undifferentiated list. Each flagged item carries the section reference it came from, a plain description of the issue, and the reasoning behind why it matters — so your reviewer can check it against the original document and decide what action is needed.
Missing control measures for identified hazards, absent emergency procedures, or potentially serious contradictions that a competent person needs to assess before work.
Vague control measures, PPE standing in for engineering controls, or plant and materials that don't match across sections — weak points, not guaranteed failures.
Outdated revision history, superseded legislation references, or inconsistent numbering — not safety-critical, but worth tidying up on the next revision.
Sections with clear supporting detail are called out too — so your team can see what's already working, not just what isn't.
The severity groups help organise the findings. They do not establish compliance or replace your competent person’s assessment.
Checks across sections
Included on every planChecking that each section exists is the easy part. The gaps that actually surface in an HSE investigation are usually contradictions between sections — and those are the hardest for a human reviewer to catch, because the two halves of the contradiction can be several pages apart.
Beyond reviewing each section individually, Valify looks for potential inconsistencies within the uploaded document. This does not compare separate uploads:
- Potential hazards without corresponding controls, or controls without a clear hazard
- Plant named in the scope that may be missing from the hazard register
- PPE requirements match the specific hazards identified, rather than being applied as a generic list
- Materials named in the scope have matching COSHH assessments
- Control measures follow the hierarchy of control, with PPE positioned as the last line rather than the first
- Emergency procedures, sign-off dates and revision history are consistent with the project described
Why this matters: a hazard without a matching control measure is one of the most common findings in HSE investigations following an incident. It is also one of the easiest things to miss when the hazard register and the control measures sit pages apart in a long document.
PDF & Word Export
PDF on all plans — Word on Growth and EnterpriseEvery report can be downloaded as a formatted PDF, giving you a consistent, timestamped record of exactly what was reviewed and what was flagged. That record is useful well beyond the review itself — it demonstrates that a structured check took place, which is difficult to evidence when review notes live in someone's inbox or in the margin of a printout.
On Growth and Enterprise, reports can also be downloaded as an editable Word document, so your team can work directly in the report — annotating findings, marking items as resolved, assigning actions, and attaching it to your own QA process without retyping anything.
- Formatted PDF export on Starter, Growth and Enterprise
- Editable Word (.docx) export on Growth and Enterprise
- Section references preserved so findings map back to the source document
- Documents and reports are retained for 90 days from upload and are then permanently deleted. Customers can request or perform earlier deletion where available.
Enterprise integrations enquiry
Enterprise discussion — availability must be confirmedAPI access and integrations are not included in Starter or Growth. If your organisation needs programmatic review, contact us to discuss your requirements. Availability, supported workflows, credentials, limits and any implementation work must be confirmed in writing before purchase.
Supported integrations and implementation scope are agreed individually. Discuss Enterprise integrations.
See what Valify finds in your documents.
3 free scans. No card required. No commitment.
Try 3 free scans