What Valify actually does.

Severity-Ranked Reports

Every scan sorts what it finds into four levels, so your team always knows where to look first instead of working through an undifferentiated list. Each flagged item carries the section reference it came from, a plain description of the issue, and the reasoning behind why it matters — so it can be acted on without re-reading the document to work out what was meant.

Because the ranking is applied the same way on every document, the output stays comparable across reviewers, sites and months — which is the part manual review struggles to sustain.

Cross-Document Checks

Checking that each section exists is the easy part. The gaps that actually surface in an HSE investigation are usually contradictions between sections — and those are the hardest for a human reviewer to catch, because the two halves of the contradiction can be several pages apart.

Beyond reviewing each section individually, Valify cross-references the whole document:

• Every hazard identified has a corresponding control measure — and every control measure maps back to a real hazard
• Every item of plant named in the scope of works also appears in the hazard register
• PPE requirements match the specific hazards identified, rather than being applied as a generic list
• Materials named in the scope have matching COSHH assessments
• Control measures follow the hierarchy of control, with PPE positioned as the last line rather than the first
• Emergency procedures, sign-off dates and revision history are consistent with the project described

PDF & Word Export

Every report can be downloaded as a formatted PDF, giving you a consistent, timestamped record of exactly what was reviewed and what was flagged. That record is useful well beyond the review itself — it demonstrates that a structured check took place, which is difficult to evidence when review notes live in someone's inbox or in the margin of a printout.

On Growth and Enterprise, reports can also be downloaded as an editable Word document, so your team can work directly in the report — annotating findings, marking items as resolved, assigning actions, and attaching it to your own QA process without retyping anything.

• Formatted PDF export on Starter, Growth and Enterprise
• Editable Word (.docx) export on Growth and Enterprise
• Section references preserved so findings map back to the source document
• Every report timestamped and retained in your account for 90 days

API Access

Enterprise plans include API access, so document review can run inside the systems your team already uses rather than as a separate step someone has to remember. Submit a document programmatically from your document management system, CDE or internal compliance tooling, and receive the structured report back as JSON — severity levels, section references, descriptions and reasoning all as addressable fields.

That makes it possible to trigger a review automatically whenever a subcontractor uploads a RAMS document, block progression in your own workflow until Critical findings are resolved, or write results straight into an existing compliance dashboard.

POST /v1/documents
  → { "id": "doc_1a2b3c", "status": "processing" }

GET /v1/documents/doc_1a2b3c
  → {
       "status": "complete",
       "analysis_time_seconds": 249,
       "findings": {
         "critical": 3, "attention": 7, "minor": 4, "done_well": 8
       }
     }

API access, rate limits and custom branded report templates are agreed as part of your Enterprise plan. To discuss it, contact the Enterprise team.